“Derivinism’imformationinamanation”:
Perceptive Reality in Color, Exempting Speech, but I’s Know True Colors Ish
Quality is a term that is
spoken of but never found to be true. No one seems to remember what it means.
It may be evaluated, but the proper questions must all be determinate and
objectively commutated in order to achieve any results. It is quite simple to lie
about the quality of an object to anyone who has ears to care, but it is a
fascinating way to express and evaluate anticipated results of style and
thought by revealing the truth slightly between two extreme decisions – called
gaps in time - As yes or no –type question-scenarios are described as reality, whenever
the consequences are entirely void, such as telling the truth or not to an
other, it becomes difficult to choose between asking questions which test the
telling of the truth or the force behind the(e) thinking about the truth.
Thus, in evaluating Truth
that is spoken, we employing SMM must accept the force-fullness in afollowing
anticipated patterns of thinking. Finding which form of questions that are
better in quality without having known a few answers before,, requires several fixed
properties to be initially assumed. Otherwise, everything would remain the same
without choices or any progress. In this case, the evaluation is the quality of
“sense” –found by inadvertently toning in on human belief in measures of
threes: change, colors, shapes; knowledge, speech, wisdom; suicide, murderer,
martyrdom. Inserting assumptions and presumptions directly between opinions continuously
loop since there is no quality in a 50-50 reasoning scheme. The cognitive
dissonance of one’s inability to assume a label(er) of anything is fortified
forever; it masks secrets under thoughts-lying between 2 extreme-truths from
questions which may never be spoken in answers.
The most-love coming from
testing SMM methods (in my senses) is providing the ultimate struggle between two
extreme opposites and the struggle to maintain secretly-self-identified as an
end point with a purpose: Remain objective, know how to change the others’ spectrum-perspective.
Eventually, through torment and tire, the one being questioned will be forced
to either choose an option, change an option, or omit the truth through self-doubt.
In logic-essence, they are suppose to remain still. However, flooding the mind
with mental distractions that are non-threatening is helpful in convincing
force and positive movement. It may be felt-experienced like a sensual
discovery of primal instincts resisting change from another.
However, if interviewers
become afraid that others’ thinking implies judgement, a “which” may appear and
try to directly change the truth about themselves and ask for help from others
during this process, the trust(er) plants reasoning and doubt against already stated
truths, which contain complicated communication barriers. By SMM, they will be
ordered to know them to define “it” (make-sense of iSMt).
Thus I must continue to convince
myself and others that an interviewee”s word” is simply not true, omitting myself
as the source of the argument, and hide under seriously fearful consequences.
Thus, the SMM-questioner either will probe under the person’s true driving
forces, ask simple questions pertaining to/about it, or propose an outlandish
question about it. This 3-point positioning is manifested in quite real ways
and orders the interviewers to create it by forming the bridge between them
together. Building mental bridges becomes an option as long as, methods of hierarchical
forms remain distance in space. demand of one’s self a forevercy of
hypothetical remeberrassments whose actual measured responses remain constant
refinance.
As long as the truth is
never told directly by the interviewer, direct consequences of realizing the
truth remain unlikely to actually happened, so, interviewers have no real
reason in lying – or to tell the truth. Thus, as SMM interviewers must always
be ready to do, applying the method will require a triangulation of questioning
which ultimately will assess the interviewee’s perceptional truth about a situation
by looping a group of questioning around a shared-common meaning. The loops are
shaped like colorful bow-ties fixed in a mind’s eye, consistently spinning
around the truth but also avoiding the same spot twice. Dervin’s bridge
metaphor, in this sense, is just as an electron in space moves around an atom,
never settling, but always maintaining precisely oppositionally-predicted from
the other. The direct oppositional distance should never change, but it shall adjusts
itself as each truth is spoken or coherently realized between the two involved.
Time to: consult my
rainbow-colored electrons that cloud my i```````s in trianglularzthatkcreepempyprincessKeepUpatternizeidomaiethorowhorigindjfkdd…..
Over time, SMM practice may
dictate which questions provoke the greatest thought/s. It is best to address
them from afar. The most negative thoughts are not those which are contextual,
but those of which are remembered as simple and true. Symbols, methods, and
words’’ sounds are great heuristic devices for doing this sucessfully.
As long as humans are presumed
to be dysfunctional, they will get help from those around them, attempting to
apply reason to madness. Reminding them about a few important factors which
they probably have forgotten/never knew is helpful.
Sucess in using SMM
It can never be expressed,
the difference between two chosen identities, without a reference point from
whence they arrived. That would require labeling of sorts. Pronouns, names, and
numbers are supposed to have fixed identities but are made up by third-party originators.
In language, the parts of speech remain constant; the most powerful identities
of this type are those that which are spoken about, but are not conceivably
tangible, like nouns. As long as the person being interviewed never questions
the true origination of made-up nouns, then they may never be able to
make-sense of a situation which is directly dependent upon the reliability of
others to either tell the truth, or
Knowledge, in fact, among
few things first is very useful. How simple is it to speak absolute truth, even
if it takes forever to change ing the truth which is being contested? One shall
forever blame God because it implies measuring definitive results based on a
small chance that anyone could gain any truth in response. I never wish to harm
my personal interests except if I am in definitive command. The goal is easy to
remember: create cognitive dissonance by means of crafting a clever execution
of allowing positive-doubt, revealed bywhich continuous “triangulation” is employed,
meta-theoretical-methodologies create patterns which continuous to repeat, over
and over again, until contracted against one’s will. The crafting of threes must
be fully employed in order to adhere to the intrinsic needs which are known for
at list of numbere-d-names.
Using SMM triangulation in
code would imply coherence in time and space through applying basic math
properties to measure quality as the force between any two determinate
endpoints. A position of objective reasoning is critical for the interviewers
never to provide anything newsworthy, and promoting positivity for life-quality.
Thanks for the class! Theseiszch
the thoughts of “PRINCESSBIZNOTCH”, from which Brenda Dervin, did inspire.
-Wink, hamlin, Smile, think-
